Skip to content
groundedby
Waitlist

Market

Who buys AI agent session data

The buyers of AI coding agent sessions - AI labs, data vendors and developer-tool companies - what each wants, and what they have paid in 2025 and 2026.

Updated October 29, 2026 // Markdown

Three kinds of buyer pay for agent session data, and they want different things.

AI labs, through data vendors

Labs train agents to do multi-step work, and they need examples of that work: a person with a goal, an agent acting, errors and fixes. They mostly buy through vendors that recruit people and package the data.

Known prices in 2025 and 2026:

Buyer or vendor What they paid for Price
Mercor (for an unnamed AI lab) A recorded ~50-turn coding session on your own project $500, then $200, per accepted session (Oct 2026)
Snorkel AI (for Anthropic) About an hour comparing Claude Code outputs $280 per task (reported June 2026)
HUD DataVendor Tasks and environments for agent training Typically $500 - $1,500 per task
micro1 Company operating data, including agent trajectories $200k - $2M+ per deal (company data)

Labs also spend heavily on training environments. In September 2025 The Information reported that Anthropic's leaders had discussed spending more than $1 billion on them over a year.

The catch for individuals: most of this money pays for commissioned work, where the vendor sets the task and reviews the result. Passive history from your laptop is a newer and less proven product.

Data vendors and brokers

Between labs and people sits a growing layer of vendors buying data in bulk: codebases, ticket histories, Slack archives from shut-down startups. In August 2026 The Information reported startups selling old Slack threads and tickets to AI buyers. Individual sessions are a small part of this market so far.

Developer-tool companies

This buyer is newer and, for session data, possibly the best fit. Agents now pick, install and configure developer tools on a person's behalf. A database, analytics or deployment company sees the API calls its servers receive, and nothing of what came before:

  • which docs page the agent read, and whether it understood it;
  • which command it tried first, and the error it hit;
  • why it chose this product over another, or gave up.

Sessions answer those questions, and the company can verify each one against its own server logs. groundedby's waitlist has a side for these companies.

What this means for your history

  • The proven market pays for specific, commissioned sessions.
  • Buyers ask for long sessions of real work with tools. What makes a session valuable.
  • Your history is most useful where it shows a product or domain a buyer cares about.

Questions

Do AI labs buy sessions directly from developers?+

Rarely. Labs mostly buy through data vendors such as Mercor, Snorkel AI, Scale AI and Surge AI, which recruit developers and deliver the data.

Why would a developer-tool company want sessions?+

Agents now choose and set up developer tools on a person's behalf. A company sees the API calls its servers receive, but not what the agent tried, read and decided before them.

Sources

  1. Mercor, "Share Your AI Coding Sessions" posting (archived Oct 8, 2026)
  2. Business Insider, Snorkel AI contractors improving Claude Code (June 1, 2026)
  3. TechCrunch, Silicon Valley bets big on environments to train AI agents (Sept 21, 2025)
  4. The Information, startups find old Slack threads and tickets suddenly in high demand (Aug 13, 2026)
  5. HUD DataVendor, what you can sell
  6. micro1, data partnerships

Waitlist

Your sessions, your call.

We are building an opt-in marketplace where developers license redacted sessions they pick, one by one. Join to hear first.

Your email and the side you picked. Nothing else. Privacy